Enter it, roommates! The Trump administration seeks to prevent Americans from using snady advantages on junk food. Naturally, the potential ban inspired mixed reactions on social networks and beyond. Earlier this week, Adam Housley– who is married to Tamera Mowry–weighed by highlighting his experiences with the fraud of food coupons.

In relation: SIK SIKE?! Ruin social media after the White House shared this message from Valentine’s Day

Here is the context of the potential ban

In the past 48 hours, Tamera Mowry’s husband has finished people who, he said, missed the point of his recent comments. So let’s break down what he really said. On February 18, Adam responded to a message Citing an article from the New York Times. The message highlighted Robert F. Kennedy Jr.The potential prohibition of junk food for SNAP receipts, the additional nutritional aid program.

The Secretary of Health and Social Services Kennedy Jr. and the new Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins You want to restrict certain treats, such as “soda or processed foods”, eligible snap. The program pays around $ 113 billion to around 42 million Americans.

“The only place where I would say that we really have to change politics is the Snap program and food coupons and lunches in school,” said Kennedy Jr. on Fox News last week. “There, the federal government, in many cases, pays it. And we should not subsidize people to eat poison. »»

In a separate interview, Rollins agreed with Kennedy’s “Make America Healthy Again” movement. She said, “When a taxpayer puts money in snapshots, we agree with us using their taxes to feed really bad food and sugary drinks to children who may need something more nutritious?”

Adam Housley calls fraud past with stamps

On X, Adam Housley explained his past experience with people committing fraud using stamps.

“… I cannot tell you how many times I saw people coming to buy shit for their children with food coupons, then open the wallet and use money for alcohol, beer, beer, beer, beer, beer, beer, beer, beer, beer, beer, beer, beer, beer, beer, beer, beer, beer Wine and cigarettes, “wrote Adam Housley. “Then there were those who would buy a lemon or a lime several times, get the change, take out, throw them away and redo it. Until they have enough change to buy cigarettes or alcohol. As a child, that annoyed me because there are people who could really use help, then there are these others who work the system. »»

To clarify, the SNAP advantages are now available on a debit card. However, during Adam’s childhood, the beneficiaries used physical food coupons – think of cut coupons! While the criticisms entered, he explained in another article how the receipts obtained the “change” of the stamps to be used on non -food articles. Adam Also recognized The modified card stamp system.

Hey Dipshit. If the lime is 10 cents and they give a dollar food, we had to give 90 cents in change. Get out through the front door and do it several times. https://t.co/f74qex5jy8

– Adam Housley (@adamhousley) February 18, 2025

While Tamera Mowry’s husband continued to tweet, mixed reactions also continued to flow! In other positions, he said he was not against people who get help but have a problem with alleged corruption.

What people have to understand is that there is an absolute need for assistance in this country and we must absolutely provide it … And in this, help people get out of it with training and Appropriate support.
Unfortunately, the system was corrupt. In California, it’s …

– Adam Housley (@adamhousley) February 19, 2025

Yeah not talk about mothers on food coupons. I clearly defended the help of families in need and I clearly saw those who benefit from it. Funny. Those who take advantage of it are those who hurt mothers in need. In addition, we help families in need since I have been a child … you? https://t.co/pzui3jnz0h

– Adam Housley (@adamhousley) February 19, 2025

Here is why the restriction of Snap purchases will be a challenge

However, the removal of certain snap foods is not as simple as it may seem. The program is managed by the USDA, not HHS, and is administered through individual states. It is authorized by the Federal Food and Nutrition Act of 2008. The law indicates that the SNAP advantages can be used for “any food or food product intended for human consumption”, with the exception of alcohol, tobacco and Hot food, including those prepared for immediate consumption.

According to the main analyst of policies, Katie Bergh, the exclusion of any food would require congress to modify the law or for states to obtain derogations to restrict purchases. In the last twenty Years, the legislators of several states have proposed to prevent a snap from paying bottled water, soda, fries, ice cream, decorated cakes and “luxury meats” such as steak.

“None of these requests has never been approved under Republican or Democrats,” said Bergh.

In the past, officials of the Agriculture Department have rejected derogations. In a 2007 article, the agency said there were no clear standards to define foods “as good or bad, or healthy or not healthy”. In addition, the agency also said that the restrictions would be difficult to implement, complicated and costly. And they may not change food purchases from beneficiaries or reduce conditions such as obesity.

The bills are pending at Congress and in several states to restrict the Snap advantages to pay for soda, candies and other articles. Representative Josh Bresechan, a republican of Oklahoma, sponsored the Healthy Snap Act.

“If someone wants to buy junk food on their own penny, it is him,” he said. “But what we say is:” Do not ask the taxpayer to pay it and also expect the taxpayer to take the tab for the resulting health consequences. “”

In relation: Beefin ‘with the media? The White House defends the decision to ban journalists from the Associated Press after the “Golfe of America” ​​dispute

The staff of the Associated Press, Jonel Aleccia and Mary Conlon, contributed to this report.