Images Russell brand From the 2011 film “Arthur” could serve as proof in connection with an allegation of sexual assault on the set.
The actor is currently faced with criminal charges in the United States about the accusations that he sexually assaulted a female crew member in a tank during the shooting and exposed to actors.
Now Warner Bros. Discovery proposed to return hours of invisible overcoming sequences of “Arthur” during an audience in the case, where the studio is also appointed defendant.
The article continues below the advertising
The studio proposed to put hours of outings sequences

Brand’s legal problems continue to go up while Warner Bros. Now has proposed to put the releases of his film Arthur as potential proof in his case of current sexual assault in New York.
According to TimeDuring a recent audience at a Supreme New York Court, the lawyer for the studio, Patrick Lamparello, revealed that they had “a few hours of video surveys … Four or five hours, it could be more, about eight”, that they are ready to return.
Although it is not clear what the images can contain, Brand is accused by Jane Doe of exposing themselves to actors before assaulting him in a culinary. The outputs could potentially capture something incriminating.
The article continues below the advertising
In the same hearing, the Brand lawyers had tried to delay the case after having argued that there would be “overlap” with the actor’s current criminal affair, however, the request was submitted by judge Shlomo Hagler.
The article continues below the advertising
The actor is afraid of dealing with accusations in the United States

According to the New York PostThe brand is concerned that he would face charges in the United States after being struck by five charges of sexual crimes in the United Kingdom after a long investigation into his past business.
His lawyers had attempted to delay the civil prosecution, which was filed by Jane Doe in 2023, fearing that he could not “overlap” with his criminal probe in the United Kingdom
In a file of April 1, Brand lawyers noted: “The fact that Mr. Brand is already confronted with a criminal investigation in the United Kingdom – coupled with highly publicized allegations that have been made (both by this applicant and others) than Mr. Brand committed sexual assaults similar to the United States – is more than enough to support a reasonable belief”. “”
The article continues below the advertising
They added that the actor did not mean anything that could incriminate him in his legal questions in the United Kingdom
The New York Judge, however, refused Brand’s lawyer’s lawyer to delay the civil prosecution.
The article continues below the advertising
Russell Brand faces five accusations of sexual crimes in the United Kingdom

In the United Kingdom, Brand is accused of rape, indecent assault, oral rape and two chiefs of sexual assault linked to the accusations of four women.
Metropolitan police confirmed the accusations on Friday, April 4, in a press release on their website on Friday, April 4.
The declaration also detailed the time of incidents that led to charges, showing a calendar between 1999 and 2005.
“In 1999, a woman was raped in the Bournemouth region. In 2001, a woman was attached indecently in the Westminster region of London. In 2004, a woman was raped orally and sexually assaulted in the Westminster region of London. Between 2004 and 2005, a woman was sexually assaulted in the region of Westminster statement.
The authorities also asked anyone “assigned by this case by this case, or anyone with information, to come forward”.
Following the accusations, Brand should appear in court for his first hearing on May 2.
The article continues below the advertising
Russell Brand denied allegations

In response to the charges, Brand went to his Instagram page to refuse charges in a long video declaration.
“We are very lucky to live in a time when there is so little confidence in the British government,” he started. “We are very lucky, I suppose, that it happens at a time when we know that the law has become a kind of weapon to use against people.”
The actor continued by recognizing that he lived in a capricious way in the past, describing his old self as a “crazy”, a “drug and sex addict”, and even a “fool”. However, he denied being a “rapist”, as the accusations brought against him claim.
“I have never engaged in a non -consensual activity, I pray so that you can see this while looking in my eyes,” added the actor.
He also mentioned that he felt “grateful” for the opportunity to challenge his innocence before the court when the trial began.
The article continues below the advertising
Why the actor was investigated by the British police

British police launched an investigation into the previous driving of Russell Brand in September 2023, following an investigation by the Sunday Times, Times of London, and the TV network Channel 4 in certain allegations against him.
The result of the investigation revealed that Brand would have sexually assaulted and raped four women between 2006 and 2013.
One of the women, Nadia, said to Daily mail This brand had raped her in her residence in Los Angeles on the morning of July 1, 2012. She said that that day, the brand had suggested that she participate in sexual activities with him and a friend who was waiting in her room. However, when she refused her offer and tried to leave, he raped her against a wall without a condom.
Another woman said that the controversial actor had attacked her at the age of 16 and that they were in an emotionally abusive relationship. Russell would have been at the start of the thirties at the time.
At the time, Brand also denied these accusations, saying that he was “very, very promiscuity in his past”, but it was “absolutely always consensual.