Prince HarassThe unconventional decision to step back from royal tasks and spend most of his time abroad has prompted Ravec to deviate from the standard protocol when he decides to reduce his security funded by the State.

The lawyer representing the Ministry of the Interior, Sir James Eadie KC, made the argument during the second hearing for the Duke’s call.

Prince Harry’s lawyer Shaheed Fatima KC, previously declared during his opening argument that Ravec had not obtained a risk analysis from the risk management board before making the decision, which is a standard procedure to determine these questions.

The second day of Harry’s call on his retrograde security, Home Office lawyer James Eadie KC, said more about the reason why the decision was taken without consulting a risk management board.

“RMB risk analysis is the usual approach in the usual cases,” said lawyer at the High Court during the procedure, “said Daily mail. “But there is nothing in the caller [Prince Harry’s] Announcement in January 2020 that he had to step back from his role in the royal family and spend most of the time abroad was usual. “”

The lawyer also pointed out that it was “difficult to imagine” any more suitable person than the president of Ravec to sign the way in which the Duke’s safety provisions should change to adapt to “unique and unusual circumstances”.

He then refuted the claim of Harry’s lawyer, Shaheed Fatima KC, that the former Senior Royal was “distinguished” for “lower treatment”.

“He was not distinguished – on the contrary, the process adopted had positive advantages for him,” Eadie KC told court.

Arguing for Harry, Fatima KC insisted that Ravec should not have deviated from their original guidelines for obtaining a risk analysis.

She also noted that the Duke did not see the new “tailor -made” arrangement as something better but rather as a vindictive act apparently implemented in response to his decision to leave the Senior royal life.

She said, “The appellant [the Duke of Sussex] Do not accept that tailor -made means better – in fact, in its position, this means that it has been distinguished for different and lower treatment. “”

Meanwhile, Fatima KC reiterated his position that the judge who had previously ruled in favor of Ravec was wrongly acted.

It had previously argued during the first hearing that the judge did “inappropriately and inappropriately inappropriate” to the Commission on the basis of their decision -making and not to “appreciate the role of the RMB”, according to the Daily mail.

At the time, the high -level lawyer also noted that “the judge made an error by concluding that the mandate granted Ravec the discretion of not using the reference conditions in certain cases”.

The last procedure in the case of Harry was maintained in camera for the most part due to some of the evidence presented by being deemed “highly confidential”.

“Some of the evidence in this case, which are presented before the Court of Appeal, were agreed between the parties to be highly confidential,” judges the judges, Sir Geoffrey Vos, Lord Justice Bean and Lord Justice Edis, during the first procedure.

They added: “that the evidence concerns the security agreements and threat levels and assessments for the applicant and other public figures” and “would interest any person wishing to harm a person in the context of the security agreements”.