King Charles would be determined to stay on the throne despite his current battle against cancer.

The monarch, which was diagnosed with a form of cancer not disclosed in February 2024, had to cancel several royal commitments due to the disease.

However Prince William Intensified to assume more royal tasks in his father, the place of King Charles, there are no plans for an official transfer of the crown for the moment.

Since the diagnosis of King Charles cancer has been made public, speculation swirled to find out if he would abdicate the throne in favor of his apparent heir, Prince William, to focus entirely on his health.

These rumors have gained ground while Prince William has more and more responsibility. However, according to Royal Hillary Fordwich expert, Charles is committed to remaining king despite his health challenges, and there is total support for his decision.

“Prince William and Princess Catherine do not actively seek an immediate ascent,” said the expert after revealing that the Royal duo was put by an “accelerated preparation calendar” Digital Fox News.

Fordwich also noted that other members of the Senior Royal Family, including William and Catherine, are “more focused on the best interests in the stability and continuity of the monarchy”.

“”[They] All are content with progressive transition rather than immediate decisions. The only precise thing is that an abdication would be a significant difference in all tradition, “said the royal expert.

Fordwich also linked King Charles’s decision to stay on the throne a desire to avoid a potential “constitutional crisis”.

She referred to the abdication of 1936 of Edward VIII, who resigned to marry the American worldly Wallis Simpson, which caused an outcry at the time.

According to Fordwich, the royal family would like to avoid repeating such a scenario, in particular for a period already marked by health problems and a public examination on royal scandals.

“Given the values ​​of his mother, King Charles is most likely to do everything he can to continue to serve, devoting himself to duty,” added the expert.

Another expert, Ingrid Seward, had previously linked Charles’s reasons to stay on the throne in the middle of his battle against cancer so that he is a “work executioner”.

“”[King Charles] been so conditioned at work that I do not think he works unless he works, “said the editor -in -chief of Majesty magazine Nowsweek On the monarch.

“When he doesn’t work, he’s probably everywhere … He still works, and it’s just not his nature to take a nap in the afternoon,” added Seward.

In the meantime, William will continue to assume more roles in the place of his father. However, Charles will not attribute more than what is strictly necessary for his apparent heir.

“It seems unlikely that the king wants to back up his duties more than what is strictly necessary,” said British broadcaster Jonathan Sacerdoti Digital Fox News. “Although he had to cancel certain commitments recently, this caused a very minimal disturbance of his scheduled schedule. It has always been clear that his work ethics forces him to be as busy as possible.”

Sacredoti also stressed that the king intended to follow the same scheme as his mother, Queen Elizabeth II, who had the help of the royal family during her older years, but continued to exercise a large part of his royal duties.

“The example of the older years of his deceased mother shows that, if necessary, the royal family can accommodate the burden, if necessary,” noted the journalist about Charles.

He added: “But just like Queen Elizabeth II continued to work well in his old age, and even when she was not entirely healthy, I am sure that the king will want to do the same and continue as much as possible.”