In a new interview, Lisa Barlow recently shared her feelings about her season 5 comrades and which she would get rid of if she was lucky.

Bravo is currently distributing reunion in three parts of Rhoslc, which will see Barlow in the center of a large part of the conflict.

However, this is not a new territory for the owner of Vida Tequila – or fans of the show. Barlow has been one of the driving factors of the drama of the program since his beef with the majority of actors during season 1.

His complicated relationships with some of the ladies have only worsened over time, as presented in the first two parts of the recent reunion, when Barlow was constantly fought with the new Venu Bronwyn Newport and the Returnters Angie Katsanevas and Whitney Rose.

Although the pressure could be intimidating, she did not break Barlow, who said to Dailymail She is ready to come back for season 6 as long as Bravo aura.

On the other hand, however, she is not looking forward to filming with some of her comrades. In fact, there is someone in particular that she would already have on the blockage if she called the gunshots.

“I mean, I would not have asked Whitney last year or this year,” Barlow said. “… She is another in which her scenario this year was a lie, lie, lie.”

She continued, saying that she had tried to work on her relationship with Rose.

However, Barlow noted that going to a better place with it was complicated because it lacks confidence. “… it ages with lies,” she said.

Throughout season 5, Barlow had several explosive arguments with Newport and Rose. And it didn’t stop there. She too briefly fought with Mary Cosby and Katsanevas.

In Reunion, some of the ladies called Barlow for being cold and aggressive, an accusation against which she defended herself since the show began to be broadcast in 2020.

During his interview, Barlow also called his park, Utah, Co-Stars for throwing dirt on his alcohol brand, LIFEapparently hinted that they were envious of his successes.

“… no one else has what I have,” she said before saying that she is the only “Rhoslc” actor to create a product “which can sell for hundreds of millions dollars “.

She continued by saying that she differs from the others because she joined the series as a “self-made” woman who had “10 steps ahead of others. “I think it’s difficult for them,” she said.

Although Barlow shared strong opinions on which of her SLC friends she had ax of their very successful series, fans could not be more in disagreement.

In the comments, several users have expressed their dissatisfaction with Barlow, 50, which is undoubtedly one of the stars in small groups of the franchise.

“I would like to see Lisa and Meredith [Marks] Focused, “a user wrote.” Their constant moan is no longer entertaining. “”

Someone else has clearly accepted, writing that if Bravo planned to clean the casting, he should “start with Lisa”. According to them, Barlow is a star of reality “who never takes responsibility” for his behavior and “thinks too much of herself”.

Maybe Barlow’s comrades have a reason to speak.

In the summer of 2024, the “Real Housewives” OG was prosecutedBart Carlson, for more than $ 400,000. According to reports, Carlson has lent the mother of two large amounts of money over the years to help her businesses, vida and luxury marketing.

Carlson said first lend money to Barlow in 2010 and continued to issue his money until February 2018. According to him, each time he asked to recover the money he gave, Barlow mentioned her finances in difficulty as the reason why she could not reimburse him.

Barlow, who is always ready to defend himself against his greatest detractors, has retaliated, calling for “false” claims.

The franc television star recognized her relationship with the complainant, saying that the pair was a partner of the food industry; However, their business has closed almost a decade before.

“I pay my invoices and my obligations, and I always have.

She finished, saying that she was eager to be justified before mentioning that she was planning to hold Carlson “responsible for damage” that “personal attack can cause me or my businesses”.