Jay-Z broke his silence after the dismissal of a sexual assault trial which alleged him and the besieged rapper Sean “Diddy” Combs raped a 13 -year -old girl in 2000.
Jay-Z labeled the dismissal as a “victory”, slamming allegations as “fictitious” and “appalling” while arguing that the trauma that his family has endured “can never be rejected”.
Diddy’s lawyers also talked about the dismissal, saying that like this trial, others brought against the founder of Bad Boy Records “will collapse because there is no truth.”
The article continues below the advertising
The trial of sexual assault against Jay-Z abandoned

A complaint for sexual assault that was filed against Jay-Z and Diddy by a Jane Doe was withdrawn as contained in a legal file which was submitted on Friday in New York.
The trial had allegedly alleged that the two hip -hop stars had raped a 13 -year -old girl in an after -party VMA Awards in 2000.
However, the lawyer representing the anonymous accuser, Tony Buzbee, was filed to withdraw the case, claiming that the applicant “gives by this the opinion that the action … is deliberately rejected, with prejudice”.
As the trial has been removed with prejudice, it can no longer be refreshed in its current form.
The article continues below the advertising
Jay-Z calls for dismissal a “victory”, but notes that the “system failed”

Shortly after the abolition of the case, the Jay-Z entertainment company, Roc Nation, published a declaration signed by the rapper referring to the dismissal as a “victory”.
“Today is a victory,” the statement started. “The frivolous, fictitious and appalling allegations were rejected. This civil prosecution was baseless and never went anywhere. The fictitious history they created was laughable, if not the gravity of the affirmations.”
He continued: “I would only like this experience on anyone. The trauma that my wife, my children, my dear beings and I endured can never be rejected. This lawyer from 1 to 800 can deposit a hidden prosecution behind Jane Doe , and when they quickly realize that the seizure of money will fail, they can leave without repercussions.
The article continues below the advertising
Jayz added that “the system has failed”, noting that even if the court “must protect the victims”, he must also “protect the innocent of the accused without proof” with “the same ethical responsibility”.
“May the truth prevail over all the victims and people who are also wrongly accused,” he concluded.
The article continues below the advertising
Jay-Z has sworn his accuser and his lawyer would not get “a red penny” of him

The rapper of “The Empire State of Mind” previously criticized the accusation as an attempted “blackmail” of Buzbee and the alleged victim to force a regulation.
He wrote: “My lawyer received a blackmail attempt, called a letter of request, of a” lawyer “named Tony Buzbee. What he had calculated was the nature of these allegations and the public examination will make me want to settle down. “
The rapper added: “No sir, he had the opposite effect! It made me want to expose you for the fraud that you are very publicly. So no, I will not give you a red penny !! “”
The article continues below the advertising
He had previously placed the name of his accuser revealed by the Court instead that she was pursuing the case anonymously. He explained in his file that he thought that the trial had been filed because he refused to give in to the “exorbitant” requests of the lawyer for the alleged victim.
In the meantime, in a separate declaration at the BbcJay-Z’s lawyer Alex Spiro said the case “should never have been brought”.
“By getting up in front of odious and false allegations, Jay did what few people can – he has rejected, he never moved, he never paid 1 penny, he triumphed and erased His name, “Spiro said in the press release.
“ Flagrant red flags ” in the history of the accuser of rape of Jay-Z

According to the Daily mailJay-Z’s lawyer, Spiro, had previously filed a 30-page request where he said that there were “flagrant red flags” in the history of the rapper’s rape accuser because he also asked That measures be taken against the lawyer for the accuser, Buzbee, to cause “extraordinary evil” to his client.
In his file, Spiro highlighted several perceived inconsistencies, saying that this showed that his statements were “obviously false”.
The woman in question said in her file that rape had occurred in a “large white residence with a closed u -shaped driveway”.
However, Spiro wrote that the night in question, Diddy was seen in the Lotus nightclub in New York with her girlfriend then, Jennifer Lopez, and in another Manhattan club, twirl.
The article continues below the advertising
The accuser said he saw the musicians Fred Durst and Benji Madden at the After -pter -Party, but they did not attend the VMA that year.
In addition, the woman allegedly alleged that she had watched the event on a jumbotron outside the place, but Spiro says that New York officials have constantly “denied MTV permits”.
Diddy’s lawyers maintains his innocence

Responding to the dismissal on Friday, the Diddy’s legal team also published a declaration declaring his innocence.
A declaration at Breath Read: “For months, we saw a case after the case deposited by individuals hidden behind anonymity, advanced by a lawyer more focused on the headlines of the media.”
He added: “It was only the first of many who will not hold the court.”
Diddy is currently locked up at the famous metropolitan detention center in New York when he is accused of sex, racketeering and transport to engage in prostitution.
Since his detention, he had attempted to guarantee the release under deposit several times, but was refused and would remain in prison until his trial on May 5.