A friend of Prince Harry And Meghan Markle supported the royal couple as criticism during their lives since they fell from their roles when the senior royals persist.

The Duke and the Duchess of Sussex have been criticized for various reasons since their release in 2020.

Now, their close friend, the famous chef José Andrés, criticized the hatred they received, saying that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle use their platforms “to bring the voice and life to the problems” rather than “living in their own cave”.

Speak with Page six At City Harvest presents the 2025 Gala: Carnival in New York, José Andrés expressed his confusion on constant criticisms intended for Prince Harry and Meghan since they fell from their royal functions and have moved to the United States

He defended the duo, calling them an “incredible couple” and noting that he only wants to “talk about the good things they do”.

The chief then stressed that the Sussex could have chosen to be “in their own cave and do nothing” after leaving royal life, but they use their platforms “to bring voice and life to problems”.

Giving a context to his remarks, Andrés recalled how Harry and Meghan provided help with survivors of Los Angeles forest fires.

“When they were in Los Angeles during the fires, they were truly in the fires,” added the non -profit CEO. “When the cameras did not ride, they were there to listen to people, and they made them feel like the most important person in the world.”

Some of the recent reactions directed against Prince Harry and Meghan came from Dr. Sophie Chandauka, president of African charity of Harry, Sentebale.

Last month, following the resignation of the founder of the Invictus Games of the Organization, Chandauka made the headlines by qualifying the brand of the “toxic” couple in a bomb interview.

“The number one risk for this organization was the toxicity of the brand of its leader,” said Dr. Chandauka, before adding that the couple who fell from his royal life led to a drop in donors from the charity and hampered his hiring capacity.

“When you start to interview people, they ask questions about, well, these messages mixed around the boss,” she added, by The mirror.

The president of the trustee also accused Harry of intimidation and misogyny, with her claims and the organization which was the subject of an investigation by the charity.

Another person who has published a series of criticisms against Harry and Meghan is the former editor -in -chief of Vanity Fair, Tina Brown.

In a conversation with The telegraphShe said that the Duke and the Duchess had had a more important positive impact while operating under the royal umbrella than by all that they have done since he moved away from the monarchy.

She said: “Him and Meghan talk about” doing good “, but what are they for good? The good that you can do as Royal is so much more powerful.”

The veteran journalist then described the couple “tourists in the event of a disaster”, referring to his visit to the survivors of California forest fires.

She also said that the duo had a great “appetite for money”, which, she said, led them to make “disastrous decisions”, such as the replacement “of Prince Harry and the interview of Oprah.

PreviouslyBrown criticized Meghan on his cooking show, “With Love, Meghan”, and the approach of the former actress to promote her lifestyle brand, as always.

Speaking of the show, Brown said he was proof that Meghan has an “infallible instinct to make a mistake” and that she “never understood a convincing personality”.

She also used strongly written remarks when the Meghan lifestyle brand references.